Monday, March 16, 2009

Who am I? Who am I becoming?

I certainly have changed in the last eight months that I have been away from home. But why?
Why do people change when situations change?
Does the environment really play that much of a role in our thought process and the way we lead our lives?
I just realized that it does. It plays a much larger role than I expected.
I always assumed that I wouldn't change unless I consciously made an effort to change, now I realize I was wrong. I changed, unconsciously. I can only speculate, and I propose that the only way to remain unchanged is to consciously and continuously try to. Then again, this is not that easy a task and I certainly don't want to trouble myself trying to keep that up. 
Anyway, when I say I have changed, I don't mean my accent, the way I dress or how responsible I am. As always, I am talking about relationships->love->long distance->analysis of my thoughts. 
I have been feeling, and I am sure Chandru will agree, that I have become very critical, cynical,and have been expecting way too much out of him. I never really thought it was me, as I am human, I automatically blamed him for the change. But now I think it might be my fault, to an extent :)
I think I know how Alexander Fleming felt when he discovered penicillin, the feeling of finding a $10 bill on the street, the feeling of learning something unexpected. I happened to watch Dilwale Dulhaniya Le Jayenge while eating lunch today as I hadn't watched a hindi movie in months..When I found Shah Rukh's act cheesy and unbelievable, I felt something shatter in me, my belief in romance, cheesy as it may be, was something I was proud of. 
Thankfully, as the movie progressed and by the time my favorite song Zara Se Jhoom Lo started playing, I found myself realizing that I had been watching too much American TV and too many hollywood movies where the underlying theme was pretty much - girl and guy feel an attraction, they are together for a bit, they have sex, they want space, they split up, they find some one else, have sex, that doesn't work out either, they move on again, and again, and again until the end: they find someone 'perfect' 100 relationships later (OR) they realize that life is best when lived alone. 
In DDLJ when Shah Rukh teases her the morning after she gets drunk and his little speech on 'Hindustani ladki ki izzat' and his 'sharif but bad boy' act is so cute, it made me realize the crudity and the predominance of sex in the western concept of love. I am not saying that romance as I imagine it in Indian terms, places no emphasis on sex, but I truly believe and would like to continue believing that sex is special... 
Anyway, my point is - love had begun to seem a lot different from what it meant to me, I had begun to seek the 'perfect', ' smooth' and 'seamless' feeling in my relationship with Chandru and obviously I didn't find it, because that feeling does not truly exist. And when I did not find it, I found myself thinking in terms of Sex and the City - i.e:Whenever there is trouble in the relationship, you up and leave - that is what I would call the stereotypical western concept of relationships. 
However, to my credit, I got through the difficult times, a wee bit grudgingly, but it is all worth it. So worth it. I love Chandru, and every time I realize that it seems unbelievable that I could have ever thought otherwise. 
Is this why they say moving to a different country is difficult? As easy as it may sound to say you must always stick to your roots, remember your culture, and as much as you want to do those things...the environment around you does bring about certain inevitable changes, some good and some bad - I must learn to have the courage to influence these influences and be the person I want to be, not just be the person I become by default. 

10 comments:

Lancelot said...

@ Meenaxi

siluvai the first

Siluvai the blushing for the comment first erase by you...

siluvai the objecting for call this blog tanglish- no tamil i speak in blog- only english...

Queen's speak English - Received Pronunciation (you know who give tat to this? me the siluvai from she received...)

Lancelot said...

blog the rolling the you

Miss Cynical ღ Åйu ღ said...

couldnt agree more..

I feel its once we experience the cultural and social pattern of other countries, do we realise the importance and need of sticking to our own roots..

I must say, I watched the cashmere mafia series, it had this excellent portrayal of women in power but when it came to relationships, that stereotypical concepts of theirs made me shiver!!..Not that I wasnt aware of it, but esp when you find so many folks around you westernizing only in terms of re/ships and following similar fashion!!


A great thought!!
cheers!

Anirudh induchudan said...

thought provoking.....

Meenaxi said...

Haha, Siluvai - I erased it because I realized that it could be interpreted in different ways, which was not my intention :)
And I am sorry Siluvai, I did not mean to offend you, your english is first class ;)

Lancelot said...

@ Meenaxi

You the no worry - if u say love to Lancelot - they the mistake Lancelot the single- me the siluvai all married Munimma...so no the doubt the u...

^_^ SENO ^_^ said...

I liked your post. Relationships are almost always fragile on LDR's . Not necessarily due to your changes :P

And whats with so much Tamil spilled all around? Am tempted to comment in tamil. Ena solara ? ;)

Meenaxi said...

Thanks seno!
Where is there any tamil in this post?! But i do agree that there is a some tamil on my blog, what can i say?! I miss it :(

Maxx said...

Western stereotypes of love... that is actually interesting. I would say that this has less to do with the west, and more to do with the rise of individualism and the pursuit of ones' own happiness.

80 years ago, there were more jobs and fewer applicants - because most women stayed home and didn't compete with men for education, jobs, etc. This reduced the opportunities for a woman to "see" the world, pursue self-actualization, have financial independence, make reproductive decisions on her own, and resolve issues she experienced in a non-patriarchal manner.

In response, most movies from that period depict 'strong' men, who provided for their families, beat back thugs and would-be rapists, and aggressively went after their own goals - while the woman sat at home and acted as a surrogate to his dream. Bollywood films may have changed since the 90s, but there are some formulaic elements of the 1990s that are not dissimilar to 'western' films from the 20s and 30s.

Cue the cultural revolution, womens' liberation, scientific advances including birth control, better education for women, etc. and we fast forward to a world where the competition has doubled. In addition, economic stability enjoyed an unprecedented 50+ year upswing. Suddenly, women didn't need to sit at home. Men didn't need to content themselves with "being the breadwinner". Everyone realized that there was "more to life" as airline travel became cheaper and more accessible. Eventually, we all realized that our own happiness was a goal worth pursuing.

Now lets get back to relationships. Would you completely subjugate your dreams for that of your significant other? Would he? Does anyone? Should they?

If you think the answer is "we won't have to", then I'm afraid this can be self-deceptive. People in the 'west' appear to move on after relationships don't work out, because the relationship is defined by "what can I not tolerate under any circumstances" rather than "what value does this person bring me, even if only occasionally". I can lay claim to that one myself - repeatedly. Thousands of years of 'culture' do not trump ten hours of popular media. And this isn't a bad thing - it teaches you to make mistakes, and learn from them - hopefully for your own ultimate good.

I will take a rain check on commenting about the less prurient aspects of the post - but if you leave this up for a decade, I'll be happy to come back to it at that time :-)

Anonymous said...

although so many long weeks have gone past since this was posted I cannot help comment on it now; because both Meenaxi and Maxx 's take on relationships and the West v East cultural difference in attitude is very interesting !
Meenaxi's comment on seeking the 'perfect, seamless, smooth' in a relationship is almost a typical expectation of a woman first time in love! (May be guys feel this too, but I dont know for sure) It is how most women - irrespective of which part of the world they are from, feel - I think
It is only later, specially if the first love does not work out, does she start looking at such perfection in love with a cynical eye...and begin seeking stuff that really matters to her...
This is the time when, in my view, does she get on the path of true actualization of her emotional needs in a relationship... in short what I am trying to say is for a woman it is a damn good thing to have a couple of failed relationships, to realize a good one when it comes along... and if one does not come along - then too nothing's lost !

Maxx 's observation on: people moving on in the west because they judge from "what can I not tolerate under any circumstances" rather than "what value does this person bring me, even if only occasionally" is so true of urban society world over, including urban India. There is really no difference between the 'western' and 'eastern' attitudes in this respect anymore.. it could be one of the few common denominators of 'globalization' :)